| |
Thrud the Barbarian #1
Written, illustrated, and published by Carl Critchlow.
reviewed by Robert
Clark
Way
back in the day, when White Dwarf was more than just a vehicle
for selling miniatures, there featured a barbarian hero, tall
of stature, muscled like a gorilla and endowed with the intellect
of a goldfish. Thrud was his name, and from humble beginnings
his cartoon strip quickly became one of the best loved pieces
in the magazine - in fact it was voted 'most popular feature'
for three consecutive years! Fair praise considering its basic
premise as a bloody Conan parody.
Unfortunately, White Dwarf changed irrevocably circa issue
100, and it wasn't too long before all non-GW features - Thrud
included - were dropped. Some twelve years later, the last
thing most Thruddites expected was an all-new comic featuring
the man himself, but that is exactly what we have.
What should first be commended is the fact that Carl Critchlow
has managed to do all the work himself. The comic design is
of a professional standard and certainly wouldn't look out
of place racked up with the Marvel and DC stuff in your local
comic shop. What is lacking are ads, and I doubt there will
be many complaints in this regard. The paper quality is good,
and the glossy cover is fine except it suffers from gathering
fingerprints too easily. Nothing that doesn't hold true for
most glossy covers though.
The cover art itself is excellent, a painting of Thrud standing
on a pile of bodies, axe in hand. The art is in the style
of Frazetta or Vallejo, essentially setting its stall out
from the beginning. The internal art is considerably different
from the old inked Thrud from WD. Instead we have full-colour
line art, drawn in a sparse but attractive style. The colouring
suggests use of Paintshop or a similar package, which is pretty
much standard in the comic industry these days. Despite the
lack of true colour blending, the colouring is used to good
effect to convey lighting. The difference in colour saturation
between the scenes is also quite clever and acts as an instant
prompt for the eye. Choice of colours is never garish and
actually acts to make the absurdity of the story more believable.
Whether long-time fans of Thrud will be happy with the change
in art direction is mostly down to personal preference. My
own opinion was quite positive, as the characterisation didn't
strike me as incorrect and the new style seemed fitting to
the story.
One of the main concerns with a full-length Thrud adventure
is whether or not it would translate properly from the original
one-page strips. The answer is a definite yes. If anything,
the original strips were heavily limited by their brevity,
not allowing a lengthier story to be developed without breaking
up the strip over several months. Even then, a story had to
be relatively self-contained within an individual page. A
24-page comic gives the writer plenty of space to play with.
There is always the opposite viewpoint though, that the Thrud
strip was almost as one-dimensional as the lead character
and a full-length comic would rapidly become boring. Thankfully
this is not the case. While Thrud retains his belligerent
yet terminally dense persona - usually terminal to those around
him - it is the development of the enveloping story that keeps
things interesting. Without giving too much away, a typically
sub-fantasy world acts as the setting for a typically cheeky
sub-fantasy pastiche. Use of informal language and parodied
clichés are par for the course, as is the occasional
in-joke; at one point Thrud utters, "By the sacred jockstrap
of Robert E Howard you'll pay for this hellspawn!!" The
casual observer might wonder whether this kind of needle is
still necessary yet it seems that the fantasy genre is as
stilted and hackneyed as ever, making Thrud's liberally aimed
raspberry as deserved as it was in 1983.
Pretentious as the above may sound, Thrud was always more
than an excuse for some ultra-violence, though this has been
the mainstay of the strip and I am happy to report that Thrud
circa 2002 is no different in this respect. It is the sheer
scale of the carnage that makes Thrud funny without being
purely adolescent; nobody could take it seriously without
being a little suspect in the first place. Another serious
point being made in a humorous comic strip? That's perhaps
a pseudy comment too far
My only real gripe with this issue is that it is a comic
and therefore seems rather scant on material. However, this
is more an observation on comics in general and probably just
the reviewer missing the point entirely. In comparison to
'professional' comics, Thrud is more than generous enough
with plot. Admittedly, the comic isn't going to be challenging
Watchmen in the importance stakes, but it manages to meet
its aims - humorous fantasy pastiche with a particularly British
flavour - admirably.
Carl Critchlow should be congratulated for taking what could
have all too easily been a nostalgic cash-in and making it
a worthy read, whether you are a fan of the original strip
or not. The current state of the British comic industry makes
it all the more unlikely, and also makes it so much more important
that we show our support when it is deserved. Whether or not
Thrud will have enough legs to be an ongoing concern remains
to be seen, as does whether it receives enough interest for
a second issue to emerge. Let's hope so.
For more information about Thrud visit http://www.thrudthebarbarian.com/
|
|